No products in the cart

States Raising Minimum Wage in 2025
Happy New Year! Twenty-three 23 states will raise their minimum...
Religious ministries frequently engage independent contractors for various services, including musicians, athletic coaches, and other specialized roles. However, proper classification of these workers is crucial to ensure compliance with federal and state labor laws. Misclassification can lead to legal penalties, back taxes, and liability for unpaid benefits. This article examines the federal independent contractor test and state-specific laws, particularly focusing on jurisdictions that use the stricter ABC test.
Federal 6-Factor Independent Contractor Test
Under federal law, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) applies a 6-factor test to determine whether a worker qualifies as an independent contractor under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). These factors assess the economic realities of the working relationship, emphasizing the worker’s degree of independence and the employer’s control. Most states follow this 6-factor test, with some exceptions noted below. A holistic review of these factors determines a worker’s classification, with no single factor being dispositive.
The Federal six factors are:
(For further information, see US Department of Labor – Wage and Hour Division (DOL/WHD) Fact Sheet.)
While the federal 6-factor test provides a baseline, many states impose stricter standards. A growing number of states use the ABC test, which presumes workers are employees unless all three of the following conditions are met:
Ministries operating in ABC test states must carefully evaluate whether independent contractors meet all three prongs applicable for their specific jurisdiction. If any prong fails, the worker is legally an employee.
Some States That Use the ABC Test
The following states have adopted the ABC test (with some variations) for worker classification:
These states generally default to employee classification unless clear independent business status is demonstrated. Please see the list below for the specific state statutory requirements.
Given these legal complexities, religious ministries should take the following precautions when compensating independent contractors:
Understanding your state’s specific rules is essential for compliance, as worker classification laws vary widely across the U.S. This table serves as a quick reference guide to help ministries identify the primary test applied in their state and locate the relevant legal statutes. By staying informed, you can avoid costly misclassification errors and ensure your ministry operates within the bounds of the law.
State | Primary Test Applied | State Law or Legal Reference |
Alabama | Federal 6-Factor Test | No specific state statute |
Alaska | ABC Test | Alaska Stat. § 23.20.525(a)(8) |
Arizona | Federal 6-Factor Test | Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 23-902(D) |
Arkansas | Federal 6-Factor Test | Ark. Code Ann. § 11-10-210(e) |
California | ABC Test | California Labor Code § 2775 (formerly AB 5) |
Colorado | ABC Test | Colo. Rev. Stat. § 8-70-115(1)(b) |
Connecticut | ABC Test | Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-222(a)(1)(B)(ii) |
Delaware | ABC Test | Del. Code Ann. tit. 19, § 3302(10)(K) |
Florida | Federal 6-Factor Test | Fla. Stat. § 443.1216(13)(a) |
Georgia | Federal 6-Factor Test | Ga. Code Ann. § 34-8-35(f) |
Hawaii | ABC Test | Haw. Rev. Stat. § 383-6 |
Idaho | ABC Test | Idaho Code § 72-1316(4) |
Illinois | ABC Test | 820 Ill. Comp. Stat. 185/10 |
Indiana | ABC Test | Ind. Code § 22-4-8-1(b) |
Iowa | Federal 6-Factor Test | Iowa Code § 96.19(18)(f) |
Kansas | ABC Test | Kan. Stat. Ann. § 44-703(i)(3)(D) |
Kentucky | Federal 6-Factor Test | Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 341.070(3) |
Louisiana | ABC Test | La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 23:1472(12)(E) |
Maine | ABC Test | Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 26, § 1043(11)(E) |
Maryland | ABC Test | Md. Code Ann., Lab. & Empl. § 8-205 |
Massachusetts | ABC Test | Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 149, § 148B |
Michigan | Federal 6-Factor Test | Mich. Comp. Laws § 421.42(5) |
Minnesota | Federal 6-Factor Test | Minn. Stat. § 268.035, subd. 9(25) |
Mississippi | Federal 6-Factor Test | Miss. Code Ann. § 71-5-11(I)(14) |
Missouri | Federal 6-Factor Test | Mo. Rev. Stat. § 288.034.12 |
Montana | ABC Test | Mont. Code Ann. § 39-51-201(15) |
Nebraska | ABC Test | Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-604(5) |
Nevada | ABC Test | Nev. Rev. Stat. § 612.085 |
New Hampshire | ABC Test | N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 282-A:9, III |
New Jersey | ABC Test | N.J. Stat. Ann. § 43:21-19(i)(6)(A) |
New Mexico | ABC Test | N.M. Stat. Ann. § 51-1-42(F)(5) |
New York | Federal 6-Factor Test | No specific state statute |
North Carolina | Federal 6-Factor Test | N.C. Gen. Stat. § 96-1(b)(12) |
North Dakota | Federal 6-Factor Test | N.D. Cent. Code § 52-01-01(17) |
Ohio | ABC Test | Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 4141.01(B)(2)(k) |
Oklahoma | ABC Test | No specific state statute |
Oregon | ABC Test | Or. Rev. Stat. § 657.087 |
Pennsylvania | ABC Test | 43 P.S. § 753(l)(2)(B) |
Rhode Island | ABC Test | R.I. Gen. Laws § 28-42-7 |
South Carolina | Federal 6-Factor Test | No specific state statute |
South Dakota | Common Law Test | No specific state statute |
Tennessee | Federal 6-Factor Test | No specific state statute |
Texas | Federal 6-Factor Test | No specific state statute |
Utah | Federal 6-Factor Test | No specific state statute |
Vermont | ABC Test | Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1301(6)(B) |
Virginia | Federal 6-Factor Test | No specific state statute |
Washington | ABC Test | Wash. Rev. Code § 50.04.140 |
West Virginia | Federal 6-Factor Test | No specific state statute |
Wisconsin | Federal 6-Factor Test | No specific statute |
Wyoming | Federal 6-Factor Test | No specific statute |
Religious ministries must carefully classify workers to avoid legal repercussions and back worker’s compensation premiums. While the federal 6-factor test allows some flexibility, ministries in ABC test states face stricter employee presumptions. By following best practices and staying informed on state laws, ministries can responsibly engage independent contractors while protecting their organizations from misclassification risks.
Don’t let worker classification challenges disrupt your ministry’s mission. With Church HR Network’s HR 360 membership program, you’ll gain access to expert guidance, customizable templates, and state-specific compliance resources. Whether you’re navigating the ABC test, drafting independent contractor agreements, or ensuring overall HR compliance, our tools are designed to simplify HR management for faith-based organizations. Visit www.churchHRnetwork.com to learn more and join today!
For ongoing insights into HR best practices and compliance, sign up for our newsletter to receive the latest updates on labor laws, ministry management tips, and exclusive resources tailored to your needs.